Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions

1,053 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2020, methodology): “Methods: We undertook a rapid review of the literature following guidelines by the WHO and the Cochrane Collaboration’s recommendations.”
Timing Matters in Hip Fracture Surgery: Patients Operated within 48 Hours Have Better Outcomes. A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of over 190,000 Patients (2012, methodology): “Since some studies reported only adjusted hazard ratios, we converted them to ORs using a formula to compute risk ratio from OR [18].”
GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. (2019, background): “the GRADE approach into high, moderate, low and very low) [1-6].”
Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review (2015, unknown): “24 26 27 34 35 37 38 52 – 55 71 73 74 All other studies were categorised as ‘ unclear ’ or ‘ high ’ risk of bias (30 studies, 2029 and 2457 participants, respectively).”