SPECIES–AREA RELATIONSHIPS AND MARINE CONSERVATION

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

PLUGGING A HOLE IN THE OCEAN: THE EMERGING SCIENCE OF MARINE RESERVES1 (2003, background): “A second set of papers (Carr et al. 2003, Grantham et al. 2003, Halpern 2003, Neigel 2003, Palumbi 2003, Shanks et al. 2003) reviews existing data on several key ecological and life history features of marine species and communities.”
Beta diversity and taxonomic sufficiency: Do higher‐level taxa reflect heterogeneity in species composition? (2009, background): “, 2007) so to achieve complementarity (Vane-Wright et al., 1991; Niegel, 2003).”
DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation (2007, background): “geographically widespread species may have also contributed to a commonly held belief that species-area relationships are unimportant in the marine realm, despite evidence to the contrary (Neigel 2003).”
Population models for marine reserve design: A retrospective and prospective synthesis (2003, background): “To incorporate multispecies dynamics into marine reserve models, one might consider the distribution of top predators as indicators of biodiversity hotspots (Reeves 2000), a description of several populations of a small number of species (Neigel 2003) or a community or habitat approach.”