A wavelet whittle estimator of the memory parameter of a nonstationary Gaussian time series
By Eric Moulines, Franccois Roueff, Murad S. Taqqu. 2006
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider a time series X = {X k , k ∈ Z} with memory parameter do ∈ R. This time series is either stationary or can be made stationary after differencing a finite number of times. We study the "local Whittle wavelet estimator" of the memory parameter d 0 . This is a wavelet-based semiparametric pseudo-likelihood maximum method estimator. The estimator may depend on a given finite range of scales or on a range which becomes infinite with the sample size. We show that the estimator is consistent and rate optimal if X is a linear process, and is asymptotically normal if X is Gaussian.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Finance, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c288b6f8dada0035d0ae642f171c7489bd89c042
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Finance
- Franccois Roueff
- Gilles Faÿ
- Murad S. Taqqu
- Eric Moulines
- David Nualart
- R. von Sachs
- Stilian A. Stoev
- Alec N. Kercheval
In Statistics and Probability
- Franccois Roueff
- Gilles Faÿ
- Murad S. Taqqu
- Eric Moulines
- Francis R. Bach
- Gareth O. Roberts
- Arthur Gretton
- Galin L. Jones
Citations in the corpus
- Wavelet estimation for operator fractional Brownian motion (2015, unknown): “…second, one takes the limit with respect to the scales themselves; however, the latter must go to infinity slower than the sample size, a feature our estimator shares with Fourier or wavelet-based semiparametric estimators in general (e.g., Robinson (1995a), Moulines et al. (2007b, 2007a, 2008)).”
- Estimators of Long-Memory: Fourier versus Wavelets (2008, methodology): “ss. The results are in general not as complete as in the linear case, and the required assumptions are specific to each considered model (abstract assumptions like in (Dalla et al., 2006, Eq. (8)) or (Moulines et al., 2007c) can be used, but checking these still require model-dependent conditions). I”