Innovation and market value: a quantile regression analysis
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c27f7ce064a8fd0a4dc7945332ca89b81febdf72
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Riccardo Leoncini
- Alberto Marzucchi
- Alex Coad
- Sandro Montresor
- Rekha Rao
- Francesco Rentocchini
- Ugo Rizzo
- Wei-Ting Hung
Citations in the corpus
- Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? (2016, unknown): “Quantile regression has been frequently applied to analyse issues related to the distribution of returns to innovation (Coad and Rao, 2006; Coad and Rao, 2008; Goedhuys and Sleuwaegen, 2009; Hölzl, 2009; Kaiser, 2009; Love et al., 2009; Ebersberger et al., 2010; Segarra and Teruel, 2011; Falk,…”
- The firm-level employment effects of innovations in high-tech US manufacturing industries (2011, result): “We observe that this indicator does not appear to perform as well when we scale down innovative activity by a firm’s total sales (compare the results here with those in Coad and Rao (2006) and Coad and Rao (2008)).”
- Pricing determinants in the hotel industry: Quantile regression analysis (2010, methodology): “It is also applied to industry analysis (Görg et al., 2000; Girma and Görg, 2007; Yasar et al., 2006) and finance (Dimelis and Louri, 2002; Fattouh et al., 2005; Coad and Rao, 2006; Somers and Whittaker, 2007).”
- Firm Growth : a Survey (2007, unknown): “it is quite common for theoretically-minded authors to consider this to be a ‘stylised fact’ for the purposes of constructing and validating economic models (see for example Cooley and Quadrini (2001), Gomes (2001) and Clementi and Hopenhayn (2006)).”
- Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach (2008, methodology): “11Further evidence of the discrepancies between patent statistics and R&D statistics is presented in the regression results in Tables 5 and 6 of Coad and Rao (2006a).”
- Firm growth and R&D expenditure (2010, background): “Still others have focused on the influence of institutional factors on firm-level R&D investment levels, including such factors as patent protection, human capital and international openness (Falk 2006). 2. Another strand of the literature on R&D investment, which we will not survey in any detail he”
- ‘Better late than never’: the interplay between green technology and age for firm growth (2017, methodology): “3.3 Variables Our dependent variable is the growth rate of employees (Growthit), calculated as the difference between the logarithm of firm i’s employees in year t and the logarithm of employees in year t − 1 (Coad and Rao 2006; Coad 2010) (see Online Appendix A3 for details).”
- Political stability and growth: An application of dynamic GMM and quantile regression (2017, background): “Furthermore, advantage is that while conventional regression focuses on the mean, quantile regressions are able to describe the entire conditional distribution of the dependent variable (Coad and Rao, 2006).”
- Services and services innovation (2009, background): “1 See Coad and Rao (2006) for a recent discussion of the implications of this for statistical analysis of innovation and growth rates.”