Age and Growth

By R. Nash, A. Geffen. 2014

1,773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c27cf301b0c4274c3e058ac95bb37b887c676ca9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Chemical archives in fishes beyond otoliths: A review on the use of other body parts as chronological recorders of microchemical constituents for expanding interpretations of environmental, ecological, and life‐history changes (2017, background): “Indeed, aging studies have documented strong correspondences between the fin rays and otoliths of reef fishes (which tend to have relatively high site fidelity), including serranids (e.g., Murie et al. 2009), haemulids (e.g., Murie and Parkyn 2005), and lepisosteids (e.g., Glass et al. 2011).”
Trends and management implications of human-influenced life-history changes in marine ectotherms (2016, background): “Wells et al. (2013) 500 showed that overestimation of L∞ (expected in cases of faster life-histories) will overestimate fishing 501 mortality rates, because the absence of large individuals in stocks with smaller adult length-at-age would 502 bias fishery mortality estimates for older age groups…”
Brain drain: The impact of air pollution on firm performance (2020, background): “of human capital is shaped by a number of economic and financial factors: local wages and land rents (Rauch, 1993); firms’ technical changes, such as the adoption of information technology; complementary workplace reorganization; the introduction of new products and services (Bresnahan, Brynjolfsson”
Fast versus slow growing tuna species: age, growth, and implications for population dynamics and fisheries management (2017, background): “Various studies have reported growth rates ranging from 1.4 to 4.7 mm day-1 for juveniles (85–555 mm FL) (Brothers et al. 1983; Radtke and Morales-Nin 1989; La Mesa et al. 2005; Megalofonou 2006).”
Does one size fit all? An evaluation of length–weight relationships for New Zealand's freshwater fish species (2013, background): “Whilst some New Zealand species have no published length weight data, more common species may have multiple LWR published (e.g. longfin eel, Jellyman 1974; Todd 1980; Chisnall 1989; Chisnall & Hicks 1993; and more), so knowing which equation to apply to a particular dataset can be problematic.”