Education and Catholic Religiosity as Predictors of Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Toward Women and Men

By Peter Glick, Mariana Lameiras, Y. R. Castro. 2002

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c26550abfd5f0fbbb7781cb717086bde9d0ffcc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Jochen Peter
2. Patti M. Valkenburg
3. Andrew N. Christopher
4. S. M. Burn
5. J. Busso
6. Laura Vandenbosch
7. J. V. Oosten
8. Paul J. Wright

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jochen Peter
2. Patti M. Valkenburg
3. Andrew N. Christopher
4. Melinda S. Mull
5. S. M. Burn
6. J. Busso
7. Mark D. Griffiths
8. Alexander P. Schouten

Citations in the corpus

• Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism (2006, result): “However, we also believe, in accor- dance with the results of Burn and Busso (2005) and Glick, Lameiras, and Castro (2002), that the effects of religiosity are greater on benevolent sexist attitudes than hostile sexist attitudes.”
• Adolescents’ Exposure to a Sexualized Media Environment and Their Notions of Women as Sex Objects (2007, background): “Higher education and lower socio-economic status are associated with more support for women’s emancipation ( Glick, Lameiras, & Castro, 2002; Townsend, 1993).”
• Ambivalent Sexism, Scriptural Literalism, and Religiosity1 (2005, background): “However, religiosity was measured narrowly (respondents were asked whether they were “nonbelievers,” nonpracticing Catholics, practicing Catholics, or adherents of another faith).”