Attention with Intention for a Neural Network Conversation Model
By Kaisheng Yao, Geoffry Zweig, Baolin Peng. 2015
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In a conversation or a dialogue process, attention and intention play intrinsic roles. This paper proposes a neural network based approach that models the attention and intention processes. It essentially consists of three recurrent networks. The encoder network is a word-level model representing source side sentences. The intention network is a recurrent network that models the dynamics of the intention process. The decoder network is a recurrent network produces responses to the input from the source side. It is a language model that is dependent on the intention and has an attention mechanism to attend to particular source side words, when predicting a symbol in the response. The model is trained end-to-end without labeling data. Experiments show that this model generates natural responses to user inputs.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jianfeng Gao
- Mohit Bansal
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Percy Liang
- Graham Neubig
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Noah A. Smith
In Natural Language Processing
- Jianfeng Gao
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Mohit Bansal
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Michel Galley
- Graham Neubig
- Jiwei Li
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
Citations in the corpus
- A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models (2015, background): “Other researchers have subsequently sought to apply direct end-to-end Seq2Seq models (Shang et al., 2015; Vinyals and Le, 2015; Wen et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2015; Serban et al., 2016).”
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generation (2016, background): “Neural response generation (Sordoni et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2015; Vinyals and Le, 2015; Li et al., 2016a; Wen et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2015; Luan et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016; Wen et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016b; Su et al., 2016) is of growing interest.”
- Neural Approaches to Conversational AI (2018, positive): “s true in dialogue data. Indeed, in dialogue entire spans of the source may not map to anything in the target and vice-versa.4 Some specific attention models for dialogue have been shown to be useful (Yao et al., 2015; Mei et al., 2017; Shao et al., 2017), e.g., to avoid word repetitions (which are d”
- A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Model (2016, methodology): “Yao et al. (2015) employ an intention network to maintain the relevance of responses.”
- Neural Text Generation from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domain (2016, background): “, 2015), and modeling conversations and dialogues (Shang et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2015).”
- Conversational Contextual Cues: The Case of Personalization and History for Response Ranking (2016, methodology): “Perplexity, BLEU, and deltaBLEU, adapted from language modeling and machine translation communities, have been used for evaluating novel responses (Yao et al., 2015; Sordoni et al., 2015; Gal-ley et al., 2015).”
- Hybrid Code Networks: practical and efficient end-to-end dialog control with supervised and reinforcement learning (2017, background): “…which map from an observable dialog history directly to a sequence of output words (Sordoni et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2015; Vinyals and Le, 2015; Yao et al., 2015; Serban et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016a,c; Luan et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016b; Mei et al., 2016; Lowe et al.,…”
- Multimodal Transformer Networks for End-to-End Video-Grounded Dialogue Systems (2019, background): “The majority of work in dialogues is formulated as either open-domain dialogues (Shang et al., 2015; Vinyals and Le, 2015; Yao et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016a,b; Serban et al., 2017, 2016) or task-oriented dialogues (Henderson et al., 2014; Bor-des and Weston, 2016; Fatemi et al., 2016; Liu and…”
- LSDSCC: a Large Scale Domain-Specific Conversational Corpus for Response Generation with Diversity Oriented Evaluation Metrics (2018, methodology): “…methods employed by the existing NRG models can be categorized as: a) metrics inherited from Machine Translation, e.g., BLEU, Perplexity, etc. (Yao et al., 2015; Lowe et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2018); b) discrete scores measuring the quality of generated results by human labeling (Shang et al.,…”
- Topic Augmented Neural Response Generation with a Joint Attention Mechanism (2016, background): “K. Yao (Yao et al., 2015) added an extra RNN between the encoder and the decoder with attention to conclude and explain intentions from posts.”
- Generating Text from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domain (2016, background): “…(Kiros et al., 2014; Karpathy and Fei-Fei, 2015; Vinyals et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2015), machine translation (Devlin et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015; Luong et al., 2015), and modeling conversations and dialogues (Shang et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2015).”
- Paying Attention to Attention: Highlighting Influential Samples in Sequential Analysis (2018, methodology): “(Yao et al., 2015) uses an encoder-decoder framework with attention to model conversations and generate natural responses to user input.”
- A Theoretical Framework for Conversational Search (2017, background): “Conversational agents for more advanced multi-turn tasks have been proposed continuously since then, for instance recent work to isolate and resolve technical issues typically handled by a help desk [42].”