Adaptation from standing genetic variation.

By R. Barrett, D. Schluter. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008

2,167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c25971e0683d6d9a8733b84a8c321588846c28cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Population Genomics of Parallel Adaptation in Threespine Stickleback using Sequenced RAD Tags (2010, methodology): “Accordingly, we focus primarily on measures of nucleotide diversity and differentiation in allele frequencies between the derived freshwater populations and two replicate oceanic populations, quantified with the statistic FST [7,21,22,32,100,101].”
Mechanisms of Thermal Tolerance in Reef-Building Corals across a Fine-Grained Environmental Mosaic: Lessons from Ofu, American Samoa (2018, background): “By contrast, adaptation is the result of environmental selection on beneficial genotypes in a population (Barrett and Schluter, 2008; Savolainen et al., 2013).”
Contemporary evolution, allelic recycling, and adaptive radiation of the threespine stickleback (2013, background): “If recycled freshwater-adapted alleles are absent in a founding population, new mutations in freshwater populations may form the basis for adaptation (Chan et al., 2010; Leinonen et al., 2012), but that would generally delay adaptation (Barrett and Schluter, 2007; Hunt et al., 2008).”
InSTREAM-Gen: Modelling eco-evolutionary dynamics of trout populations under anthropogenic environmental change (2016, result): “Our study agrees with others in concluding that daptation to a novel environment would be fuelled more by standng variation (pre-existing segregating genetic variant) than by de ovo mutation (Barrett and Schluter, 2008).”
Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change (2011, background): “According to theory, the evolutionary rescue of populations under changing conditions depends on population size, additive genetic variation and how maladapted to the conditions the population is (Barret & Schluter, 2008; Orr & Unckless, 2008; Willi & Hoffman, 2009).”
Single-Cell Genomics Reveals Hundreds of Coexisting Subpopulations in Wild Prochlorococcus (2014, background): “Indeed, given the huge effective population size, even extremely weak fitness differentials among alleles (27) can facilitate fineadjustment of core genes (15) over the millions of years of evolution after divergence.”
The QTN Program and the Alleles That Matter for Evolution: All That’s Gold Does Not Glitter (2011, background): “Next, I show that small-effect alleles are different in kind from large-effect alleles at the molecular level, underscoring the challenge of using QTN data to understand the relationship between molecular function and phenotype evolution.”
Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations (2017, neutral): “which only one of the two LV alleles was found in the Congolese and Upper Nile taxa together (novel LV allele or unsampled in parental lineages), (2) both”
The Molecular Basis of Phenotypic Convergence (2014, background): “First, shared ancestral variation increases the probability that populations reuse the same genetic variation when confronted with novel environments (Barrett & Schluter 2008).”
Ecology and Evolution of the African Great Lakes and Their Faunas (2014, background): “Standing genetic variation may persist via the retention of ancestral polymorphism and through hybridization (Barrett & Schluter 2008), both of which are commonly observed in AGL biotas (see, e.g., Joyce et al. 2011, Loh et al. 2013, Schultheiß et al. 2009).”
Why Reproductive Systems Matter for the Invasion Biology of Plants (2010, background): “However, Friedman & Barrett (2008) demonstrated high levels of outcrossing enforced by a strong self - incompatibility system using genetic markers.”
Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes (2014, background): “Selection on pre-existing polymorphisms may operate over short time scales compared to selection on new mutations (Barrett and Schluter 2008; Vandepitte et al. 2014).”