The Use of Force between the Police and Persons with Impaired Judgment

By R. Kaminski, Clete Digiovanni, R. Downs. 2004

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c24f2693d22741693e9b8d2e2bae553f79314874

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Bolger
2. R. Tillyer
3. Charles F. Klahm

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Bolger
2. A. Watson
3. Amy N Kerr
4. R. Tillyer
5. Charles F. Klahm
6. P. Corrigan

Citations in the corpus

• UNDERSTANDING POLICE USE OF FORCE: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE (2010, background): “Similar non-significant findings were presented in other studies (Engel et al., 2000; Garner et al., 2002; Kaminski et al., 2004; Terrill et al., 2008).”
• Just Following Orders: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlates of American Police Officer Use of Force Decisions (2014, background): “Some authors report a negative relationship between experience and use of force attitudes (Kop & Euwema, 2001) and behaviors (Kaminski et al., 2004; Paoline & Terrill, 2007; Rydberg & Terrill, 2010), while others have reported non-significant results (Lawton, 2007; McCluskey, et al., 2005;…”
• Crisis Intervention Teams and People With Mental Illness (2012, methodology): “We measured resistive demeanor using the following statements: (1) The subject displayed combative/assaultive behavior; (2) The subject was verbally abusive; (3) The subject was upset/angry/agitated; (4) The subject had a calm demeanor (Kaminski et al., 2004).”