Murphy loves potatoes: experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture

By Koen Langendoen, Aline Baggio, Otto Visser. Proceedings 20th IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium, 2006

508 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dozer: Ultra-Low Power Data Gathering in Sensor Networks (2007, methodology): “The energy e‐ciency of most existing work [ 8 , 11, 17, 15, 2] stems from the application of generic energy-e‐cient MAC protocols [13, 18, 20].”
Four-Bit Wireless Link Estimation (2007, background): “We present a link estimator design with these interfaces that reduces packet delivery costs by up to 44% over current approaches and maintains a 99% delivery ratio over large, multihop testbeds.”
An empirical study of low-power wireless (2010, background): “3.5 Summary Many protocols work well on testbeds but do not act as we expect in the actual deployments [Langendoen et al. 2006; van Dam and Langendoen 2003; Hui and Culler 2004; Beckwith et al. 2004; Szewczyk et al. 2004].”
Computational Intelligence in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey (2011, methodology): “This scenario is used in most monitoring applications in agriculture [7], [8], microclimate [4], [5], [9] and habitat surveillance [10]–[12], military operations [13], and disaster relief [14].”
Collection tree protocol (2009, background): “However, as the timer length increases past [8,16]ms, goodput drops significantly as the timer introduces idleness.”
Role of IoT Technology in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review (2020, background): “The LOFAR ‐ agro Project is the best example for crop or plant monitoring [30].”