Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives

By Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Walter R. Mebane Jr.. Political Analysis, 2011

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We describe a new computer program that combines evolutionary algorithm methods with a derivative-based, quasi-Newton method to solve difficult unconstrained optimization problems. The program, called GENOUD (GENetic Optimization Using Derivatives), effectively solves problems that are nonlinear or perhaps even discontinuous in the parameters of the function to be optimized. When a statistical model's estimating function (for example, a log-likelihood) is nonlinear in the model's parameters, the function to be optimized will usually not be globally concave and may contain irregularities such as saddlepoints or discontinuous jumps. Optimization methods that rely on derivatives of the objective function may be unable to find any optimum at all. Or multiple local optima may exist, so that there is no guarantee that a derivative-based method will converge to the global optimum. We discuss the theoretical basis for expecting GENOUD to have a high probability of finding global optima. We conduct Monte Carlo experiments using scalar Normal mixture densities to illustrate this capability. We also use a system of four simultaneous nonlinear equations that has many parameters and multiple local optima to compare the performance of GENOUD to that of the Gauss-Newton algorithm in SAS's PROC MODEL.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c23d2cf2235fc5831daaa374388c73be08f9d6a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Marie Davidian
  2. Eric B. Laber
  3. Anastasios A. Tsiatis
  4. Martin Zaefferer
  5. Jörg Stork
  6. David Ginsbourger
  7. Matthew P. Hitt
  8. Joshua P. Darr

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. David Ginsbourger
  2. Martin Zaefferer
  3. Jörg Stork
  4. Victor Picheny
  5. Thomas Bartz-Beielstein
  6. M. Delignette-Muller
  7. M. Gilligan
  8. Baqun Zhang

Citations in the corpus