Elastic contact between randomly rough surfaces: Comparison of theory with numerical results

By B. Persson, F. Bucher, Bernardino Chiaia. 2002

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c23c173a73f84f46c4dabdde72d35a5007a24352

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Mechanics of Materials

In Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Citations in the corpus

A Review of Elastic–Plastic Contact Mechanics (2017, background): “Persson’s diffusion model has been shown to be very effective for elastic rough surface contact [255,256], but has not been thoroughly evaluated for elastic–plastic contact.”
A new efficient numerical method for contact mechanics of rough surfaces (2012, methodology): “Also, the numerical convergence of the proposed method has been verified by comparing the numerical results with the Hertzian solution and by checking the trend of the stress probability distribution at the interface which must vanish as the interfacial stress r goes to zero (Persson et al., 2002; P”
Modeling and simulation in tribology across scales: An overview (2018, unknown): “Numerous comparisons between complete numerical simulations, multi-asperity models and Persson's theory can be found in the literature [119 – 121, 127 – 141 ].”
A Multi-Scale Model for Contact Between Rough Surfaces (2006, methodology): “Persson and coworkers [23,24] also developed a new method for modeling rough surfaces, which is not dependent on fractal roughness, but is not scale dependent like the GW model.”
A review of micro-contact physics for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) metal contact switches (2013, methodology): “Persson et al developed a novel fractal method which is not dependent on fractal roughness and is also not scale dependent like the Greenwood model [44, 45].”
Interfacial separation between elastic solids with randomly rough surfaces: Comparison between theory and numerical techniques (2011, background): “If an asperity is pushed downwards at a certain location, the elastic deformation field extends a long distance away from the asperity influencing the contact involving other asperities further away (Persson et al., 2002).”