The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification
By Rajesh Bhatt. 2002
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c23b260ae823329860de8bfeb6bdf9a28e1cbaab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Doreen Georgi
- De Grammatica van Standaarden
- Lisa Bylinina
- I. Sichel
- Gereon Müller
- Ora Matushansky
- Martin Hackl
- J. Nissenbaum
In Language and Linguistics
- De Grammatica van Standaarden
- Lisa Bylinina
- Doreen Georgi
- I. Sichel
- Gereon Müller
- Ora Matushansky
- Martin Hackl
- J. Nissenbaum
In Philosophy
- De Grammatica van Standaarden
- Lisa Bylinina
- I. Sichel
- Doreen Georgi
- Gereon Müller
- Ora Matushansky
- Martin Hackl
- J. Nissenbaum
Citations in the corpus
- The grammar of standards: Judge-dependence, purpose-relativity, and comparison classes in degree constructions (2014, background): “Under this analysis, the head NP and the gap are part of the same movement chain – which means that potentially the head NP could reconstruct in its base position at LF and be interpreted inside a CP in the position of a trace (Vergnaud, 1974; Kayne, 1994; Bianchi, 1999; Sauerland, 1998, 2000, 2002;”
- On the Attributive Nature of Superlatives (2008, background): “11 Bhatt (2002) discusses the interpretation of superlatives and ordinals in combination with relatives (the first/best book that Tolstoy wrote) and comes to the conclusion that the superlative/ ordinal DP has to be base-generated inside the relative clause.”
- A modal ambiguity in for-infinitival relative clauses (2012, background): “…sketched in (17)a, in which the NP that is modified by the relative clause originates inside the relative clause (Carlson 1977, Sauerland 1998, Bhatt 2002, Hulsey & Sauerland 2006; cf. also Kayne 1994, Vergnaud 1974, Williamson 1987).13 The absence of a Condition C effect, exemplified in…”
- Noun‐Phrase Structure by Reprojection (2010, background): “…(2002), and Fanselow (2003) argue for reprojection in verb phrases; Bury (2003) and Bayer & Brandner (2007) apply the concept to wh-CPs, and Bhatt (2002) to N raising out of relative clauses (a version is promising to transfer the concept of reprojection to the nominal domain, where…”
- Resumptive Pronouns and Competition (2014, background): “Following Carlson (1977), Heim (1987), Grosu and Landman (1998), Bhatt (2002), Grosu (2002), and Bianchi (2004), among others, I assume that amount relatives involve obligatory reconstruction.”
- Resumptive pronouns and Matching effects in Zurich German Relative clauses as distributed deletion (2005, unknown): “The objections discussed in (Bhatt 2002: 50) therefore do not apply.”