Who Lives on the Wrong Side of the Environmental Tracks? Evidence from the EPA's Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators Model
By M. Ash. 2004
243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c22dd2cd7f2f7b75abbb567df178995f6c62d626
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring environmental inequality (2016, background): “Previous studies have emphasized the importance of fine spatial disaggregation to avoid the so-called “ecological fallacy” – erroneous inferences about smaller geographical units or individuals drawn from data on larger aggregates (Ash and Fetter 2004).”
- Regional variation in environmental inequality: Industrial air toxics exposure in U.S. cities (2014, methodology): “…regions, the estimated coefficient is negative in Table 2 but positive in Table 3, indicating that while Hispanics tend to live in less polluted cities compared to whites, within these cities they tend to live in more polluted neighborhoods – a finding in line with that of Ash and Fetter (2004).”