Martensitic transformations and shape-memory materials ☆

By Richard D. James, K. Hane. 2000

363 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of constitutive models and modeling techniques for shape memory alloys (2016, methodology): “Wang and Khachaturyan (1997) and Jin et al. (2001) used time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) kinetic equations to develop phase field models for the martensitic transformation.”
On the Cauchy—Born Rule (2008, background): “There is a good review of work on Martensitic transformations in shape-memory alloys by James and Hane [27], with over 100 references.”
Study of the cofactor conditions: Conditions of supercompatibility between phases (2013, methodology): “As general references we cite Bhattacharya (2003); James and Hane (2000); Ball and James (1987).”
Transformation-induced plasticity in ferrous alloys (2005, methodology): “If one assumes a stress-free state, the deformation gradient for austenite is FAtr 1⁄4 I and the average deformation gradients for the two martensitic variants is F ðaÞ tr , such that it satisfies the habit plane equation expressed as (James and Hane, 2000)”