A conceptual framework for comparing species assemblages in native and exotic habitats

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Global Review of the Distribution, Taxonomy, and Impacts of Introduced Seaweeds (2007, background): “…including spatial scale, demographic and functional attributes of resident species, and positive interactions, are just beginning to be revealed in marine studies, which often only involve native species (Arenas et al. 2006, Dunstan & Johnson 2004, France & Duffy 2006, Sax et al. 2005).”
Can Invasive Species Facilitate Native Species? Evidence of How, When, and Why These Impacts Occur (2006, background): “Recent reviews provide important starting points by affirming that facilitative interactions are likely more widespread than expected (Richardson et al. 2000; Crooks 2002; Bruno et al. 2005; Sax et al. 2005).”
Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (2009, background): “Attempts at quantifying or estimating effects of invasive plants on multi-taxa diversity, especially non-plant diversity, for even the most widespread and best-studied plant invasions are needed (Parker et al. 1999; Sax et al. 2005; Tallamy 2004; but see Braithwaite et al. 1989; and case studies in ”
Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species? (2010, methodology): “Following the approach of Sax et al. (2005a) , diversity was expressed as species richness, in this case the total number of species found within each forest type pooled across all structural stages and localities (i.e.”