Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities

By David M. J. Lazer, Alex Pentland, Duncan J. Watts, Sinan Aral, Susan Athey, Noshir S. Contractor, Deen Freelon, Sandra González-Bailón, Gary King, Helen Z. Margetts and 5 more. Science, 2020

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Data sharing, research ethics, and incentives must improve The field of computational social science (CSS) has exploded in prominence over the past decade, with thousands of papers published using observational data, experimental designs, and large-scale simulations that were once unfeasible or unavailable to researchers. These studies have greatly improved our understanding of important phenomena, ranging from social inequality to the spread of infectious diseases. The institutions supporting CSS in the academy have also grown substantially, as evidenced by the proliferation of conferences, workshops, and summer schools across the globe, across disciplines, and across sources of data. But the field has also fallen short in important ways. Many institutional structures around the field—including research ethics, pedagogy, and data infrastructure—are still nascent. We suggest opportunities to address these issues, especially in improving the alignment between the organization of the 20th-century university and the intellectual requirements of the field.

Subfields: General Social Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1e49d830e67269d4d2053a5f124ea773c79b740

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Social Sciences

  1. Diyi Yang
  2. Tal Yarkoni
  3. Jiaao Chen

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Jacob T. Fisher
  2. Brittany I. Davidson
  3. Caleb Ziems
  4. Diyi Yang
  5. Tal Yarkoni
  6. Daniel S. Quintana
  7. Douglas A. Parry
  8. C. Sewall

Citations in the corpus