Global hydrological models: a review

By A. Sood, V. Smakhtin. 2015

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1e4048785db1aabe56811a6ed9eca9bb983c9a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
2. Yoshihide Wada
3. Hannes Müller Schmied
4. Simon N. Gosling
5. Yoshimitsu Masaki
6. H. de Moel
7. Philip J. Ward

In Water Science and Technology

1. Yoshihide Wada
2. Hannes Müller Schmied
3. H. de Moel
4. Philip J. Ward
5. Dieter Gerten
6. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
7. Marc F. P. Bierkens

Citations in the corpus

• Climate impacts on hydropower and consequences for global electricity supply investment needs (2017, methodology): “These include the latest generation of General Circulation Models and downscaling methods, Global Hydrological Models and river routing techniques [9], and detailed datasets specifying the locations and properties of hydropower facilities, including turbine, dam and reservoirs specifications [10e12]”
• Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes: a multi-model validation study (2018, methodology): “It should be acknowledged, though, that the representation of hydrological and/or human processes is artificially altered by means of calibration/validation processes and that limited calibration may introduce uncertainties to the model output (Sood and Smakhtin 2015).”