Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment

By I. Seinen, Arthur Schram. 2006

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Priorities in social categories. (2010, background): “Empirical studies provide evidence that adults readily encode and track dynamic patterns of cooperation in their environment (e.g., Seinen & Schram, 2006), and that a population of individuals can use what were previously arbitrary markers of group membership to guide their coordination with, and…”
The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. (2012, background): “Indirect reciprocity models inspired experiments showing how reputation can promote cooperation and exploring the social norms used by human subjects (Milinski et al., 2002; Milinski et al., 2001; Seinen and Schram, 2006; Semmann et al., 2005; Ule et al., 2009; Wedekind and Milinski, 2000).”
Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective (2021, background): “Other facets of social capital have been studied in experimental research (e.g. Seinen and Schram, 2006).”
Session-effects in the laboratory (2011, neutral): “11For example both Seinen and Schram (2006) and Ivanova-Stenzel and Salmon (2008) refer to a pairwise Mann-Whitney test on session averages as conservative.”