Utilizing the clean development mechanism for the deployment of renewable energies in China

By Miriam Schroeder. 2009

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1d0f425abc91c2fa82877cc1fef386f289bac28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Zhaohua Wang
2. Zhongmin Yang
3. Yixiang Zhang
4. W. T. Chen
5. Y. P. Li
6. Ying Li
7. Xuejiao Chen
8. Guohe Huang

In Global and Planetary Change

1. W. T. Chen
2. Y. P. Li
3. Ying Li
4. Xuejiao Chen
5. Guohe Huang
6. Jianhua Yin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Zhaohua Wang
2. W. T. Chen
3. Y. P. Li
4. Ying Li
5. Xuejiao Chen
6. Guohe Huang

Citations in the corpus

• A review on global wind energy policy (2010, unknown): “14 [133].”
• Energy technology patents–CO2 emissions nexus: An empirical analysis from China (2012, background): “Specifically, Schroeder (2009) found that high project costs and the proof of additionality were general barriers to utilizing clean development mechanism (CDM) finance for renewable energy deployment in China.”
• A two-stage inexact-stochastic programming model for planning carbon dioxide emission trading under uncertainty (2010, methodology): “Therefore, the application of TISP model to CDM and JI mechanisms could be effective in: (i) developing new energy sources, mitigation technologies, and adaptation measures in the energy system [59]; (ii) making a valuable contribution to enact and adjust international climate policy [59]; (iii) des”