Fault Attacks on RSA with CRT: Concrete Results and Practical Countermeasures

By Christian Aumueller, P. Bier, Wieland Fischer, Peter Hofreiter, Jean-Pierre Seifert. Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, 2002

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1cf3725dbf73424a641d3b14a407dc3d737f759

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Jo Van Bulck
2. Frank Piessens
3. David Naccache
4. Daniel Gruss
5. Michael Tunstall
6. Michael Schwarz
7. Stefan Mangard
8. Berk Sunar

In Signal Processing

1. Jo Van Bulck
2. David Naccache
3. Frank Piessens
4. Daniel Gruss
5. Michael Tunstall

Citations in the corpus

• Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGX (2020, background): “While fault attacks have been extensively studied for adversaries with physical access to embedded devices [7, 62, 2, 26], Rowhammer remains, to date, the only known purely software-based fault attack on x86-based systems.”
• Fault Injection Attacks on Cryptographic Devices: Theory, Practice, and Countermeasures (2012, unknown): “For example, the authors of [49] have”
• The Sorcerer's Apprentice Guide to Fault Attacks (2006, background): “Although initially theoretical, this attack (implemented in [17]) stimulated the genesis of a variety of fault attacks against a wide gamut of cryptographic algorithms.”