The Eckmann–Hilton argument and higher operads

By Michael Batanin. 2002

81 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The classical Eckmann–Hilton argument shows that two monoid structures on a set, such that one is a homomorphism for the other, coincide and, moreover, the resulting monoid is commutative. This argument immediately gives a proof of the commutativity of the higher homotopy groups. A reformulation of this argument in the language of higher categories is: suppose we have a one object, one arrow 2-category, then its Hom-set is a commutative monoid. A similar argument due to A. Joyal and R. Street shows that a one object, one arrow tricategory is ‘the same’ as a braided monoidal category. In this paper we begin to investigate how one can extend this argument to arbitrary dimension. We provide a simple categorical scheme which allows us to formalise the Eckmann–Hilton type argument in terms of the calculation of left Kan extensions in an appropriate 2-category. Then we apply this scheme to the case of n-operads in the author's sense and classical symmetric operads. We demonstrate that there exists a functor of symmetrisation Sym n from a certain subcategory of n-operads to the category of symmetric operads such that the category of one object, one arrow, … , one ( n − 1 ) -arrow algebras of A is isomorphic to the category of algebras of Sym n ( A ) . Under some mild conditions, we present an explicit formula for Sym n ( A ) which involves taking the colimit over a remarkable categorical symmetric operad. We will consider some applications of the methods developed to the theory of n-fold loop spaces in the second paper of this series.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1c684d6e207d00c9ea85b26aa1a1eba97d1fc9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

  1. Martin Markl
  2. Michael Batanin
  3. C. Berger
  4. Clark Barwick
  5. David White
  6. Benoit Fresse
  7. D. Gepner
  8. Ieke Moerdijk

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Martin Markl
  2. Michael Batanin
  3. Clark Barwick
  4. C. Berger
  5. David White
  6. D. Ara
  7. Carlos Simpson
  8. Denis-Charles Cisinski

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Michael Batanin
  2. Martin Markl
  3. C. Berger
  4. Clark Barwick
  5. David White
  6. Benoit Fresse
  7. D. Ara
  8. Carlos Simpson

Citations in the corpus