Contact angle hysteresis explained.
By Lichao Gao, T. J. McCarthy. Langmuir, 2006
819 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A view of contact angle hysteresis from the perspectives of the three-phase contact line and of the kinetics of contact line motion is given. Arguments are made that advancing and receding are discrete events that have different activation energies. That hysteresis can be quantified as an activation energy by the changes in interfacial area is argued. That this is an appropriate way of viewing hysteresis is demonstrated with examples.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1a0693b6b650fbbc5ff268c384aa6a5e4faec52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Mechanics of Materials
In Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Citations in the corpus
- Mechanisms for Soil-Water Retention and Hysteresis at High Suction Range (2015, neutral): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y; a ll ri gh ts r es er ve d. Gao and McCarthy 2006).”
- Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review (2006, background): “The difference between them, referred to commonly as the contact angle hysteresis (CAH), is a measure of the surface “non-ideality” (Gao & McCarthy, 2006c ).”
- Recent Progress in Preparation and Anti-Icing Applications of Superhydrophobic Coatings (2018, methodology): “It is more meaningful to use rolling angle to describe the roll characteristics of droplets on solid surfaces, while contact angle hysteresis can well reflect the sliding or viscous characteristics of droplets on solid surface [77].”