Global strategy on invasive alien species
By J. Mcneely. 2001
466 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1991dd07956603e15ecc2fd75add7fe3627fbdf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Benefits of Classical Biological Control for Managing Invasive Plants (2005, background): “The past few decades, and particularly recent years, have seen an increase in interest, among ecologists and others, in the problem of invasive species, as evidenced by a proliferation of major works treating of the subject (e.g., Elton, 1958; Baker and Stebbins, 1965; Groves and Burdon, 1986; Moone”
- Biosecurity: Moving toward a Comprehensive Approach (2002, background): “It requires exclusionary policies and apparatuses (technologies, facilities, and personnel; McNeely et al. 2001, NISC 2001,Wittenberg and Cock 2001).”
- A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions (2020, background): “Mitigation often appeared at the end of this sequence, linked to terms such as rehabilitation or restoration, but also appeared as one of the initial management actions (McNeely et al. 2001).”
- The alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya (2007, background): “Infact, the problem of plant invasion needs global coordination for its effective monitoring and management (McNeely et al. 2001; Simberl- off et al. 2005).”
- Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species (2010, background): “For sound decisions, it is necessary to quantify the impact of invasive alien species (McNeely et al. 2001), and given limited financial resources, the species have to be ranked according to their overall impact for setting management priorities (Hiebert 1997; Wittenberg and Cock 2001; Byers et al.…”
- Invaders for sale: trade and determinants of introduction of ornamental freshwater crayfish (2012, background): “considered to be the second most important cause of global biodiversity change after direct habitat destruction (CBD 2000).”