Reliable cell tracking by global data association

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms (2014, methodology): “After the ISBI 2013 workshop, the organizing committee confirmed the accuracy of the submitted results and compiled the final rankings presented in this article.”
An Objective Comparison of Cell Tracking Algorithms (2017, unknown): “Branching Correctness (BC(i)) 28,29 : BC(i) examines how good a method is at reconstructing mother-daughter relationships.”
Keeping count: Leveraging temporal context to count heavily overlapping objects (2013, methodology): “Akin [3, 9, 11], we formulate the MAP inference step as an integer linear program (ILP) that is solved with a standard software package [1].”
A batch algorithm using iterative application of the Viterbi algorithm to track cells and construct cell lineages (2012, methodology): “As in the computation of the mitosis recall in [10], mitotic and apoptotic events were considered correct if there was a corresponding ground truth event within 50 minutes of the detected event.”