Yuck!: The Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it (2015, background): “A disgusting food can also be rejected, but the function of disgust is less clear, and still a matter of controversy (Kelly, 2011; Tybur et al., 2013).”
Minds without spines: Evolutionarily inclusive animal ethics (2020, background): “to have originally evolved as a mechanism for avoiding pathogens (Kelly 2011); however, disgust appears to have been co-opted to mediate social interactions and regulate moral judgment (Fischer 2016; Kumar 2017; May 2018).”
Disgust: evolved function and structure. (2013, unknown): “…& Rabie, 2004; Curtis & Biran, 2001; Curtis et al., 2011; Fessler, Eng, & Navarrete, 2005; Fessler & Navarrete, 2003a; Fleischman & Fessler, 2011; Kelly, 2011; Marzillier & Davey, 2004; Oaten et al., 2009; Olatunji & Sawchuk, 2005; Rozin et al., 2008; Stevenson & Repacholi, 2005; Susskind et…”