The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary
By Margot A. Hurlbert, Joyeeta Gupta. 2015
280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1434748b7069bf56f9fa0a5b0f658c67fe5de32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- M. Reed
- Anthony Charles
- Klaus Hubacek
- Alexey A. Voinov
- R. Stephenson
- J. Newig
- Karen E. Jenni
- A. Rindorf
In Sociology and Political Science
- Anthony Charles
- Klaus Hubacek
- M. Reed
- Alexey A. Voinov
- Moira L. Zellner
- R. Stephenson
- Lindsay C. Stringer
- Karen E. Jenni
Citations in the corpus
- Practical steps toward integrating economic, social and institutional elements in fisheries policy and management (2017, background): “Without downplaying the very real challenges around appropriate stakeholder participation (Hurlbert and Gupta, 2015) we suggest insufficient attention is”
- Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, background): “The level of engagement di ff ers across stakeholders and varies from one stage of the project to another (Arnstein, 1969; Hurlbert and Gupta, 2015; Reed et al., 2009).”
- How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands (2014, background): “Although recently, Hurlbert and Gupta (2015) have conceptualized this continuum as a “split ladder” of participation, recognizing that low levels of participation may be acceptable or even desirable in contexts where little disagreement exists and decisions can be made easily without reference to…”