On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networks

By Chih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ö. Arik, Chun-Liang Li, Tomas Pfister, Pradeep Ravikumar. 2019

373 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Human explanations of high-level decisions are often expressed in terms of key concepts the decisions are based on. In this paper, we study such concept-based explainability for Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). First, we define the notion of completeness, which quantifies how sufficient a particular set of concepts is in explaining a model's prediction behavior based on the assumption that complete concept scores are sufficient statistics of the model prediction. Next, we propose a concept discovery method that aims to infer a complete set of concepts that are additionally encouraged to be interpretable, which addresses the limitations of existing methods on concept explanations. To define an importance score for each discovered concept, we adapt game-theoretic notions to aggregate over sets and propose ConceptSHAP. Via proposed metrics and user studies, on a synthetic dataset with apriori-known concept explanations, as well as on real-world image and language datasets, we validate the effectiveness of our method in finding concepts that are both complete in explaining the decisions and interpretable. (The code is released at this https URL)

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yulia Tsvetkov
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Vidhisha Balachandran
  4. Eduard H. Hovy
  5. Zhi Chen
  6. Phillip Isola
  7. Amir Globerson
  8. Percy Liang

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Yulia Tsvetkov
  2. Zhi Chen
  3. Vidhisha Balachandran
  4. Eduard H. Hovy
  5. James Y. Zou
  6. Gesina Schwalbe
  7. Bettina Finzel
  8. Dheeraj Rajagopal

Citations in the corpus