The Statistical Information on Recidivism - Revised 1 (SIR-R1) Scale: A Psychometric Examination

By L. Motiuk. 2002

56 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, background): “…(Hoffman and Adelberg 1980, Hoffman 1994), the Offender Group Reconviction Scale (Copas and Marshall 1998, Maden et al. 2006, Howard et al. 2009), the Statistical Information of Recidivism scale (Nafekh and Motiuk 2002), and the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (Andrews and Bonta 2000).”
Absolute Recidivism Rates Predicted By Static-99R and Static-2002R Sex Offender Risk Assessment Tools Vary Across Samples (2012, methodology): “…al., 2006], the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory [Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2004], the Statistical Information on Recidivism - Revised 1 [Nafekh & Motiuk, 2002], the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment [Hilton et al., 2004], the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool - Revised…”
Assessing the Risk and Needs of Supervised Sexual Offenders (2015, background): “…officers, such as the Level of Service Assessments (Andrews, Bonta, & wormith, 2010) and the Statistical Information on Recidivism–Revised (SIR-R1; Nafekh & Motiuk, 2002), which also predict general recidivism among sexual offenders (Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2009; wormith, Hogg, & Guzzo, 2012).”