Responses of CAM species to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations

By P. Drennan, P. S. Nobel. 2000

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c113df643090c22fa419f0da0524f5baf7375371

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Philip W. Rundel
2. J. E. Keeley
3. Juli G. Pausas
4. W. Bond
5. F. S. Gilliam

In Molecular Biology

1. Philip W. Rundel
2. J. E. Keeley
3. John C. Cushman

In Plant Science

1. John C. Cushman
2. Hans J. Bohnert
3. J. E. Keeley
4. Juli G. Pausas
5. M. Ashraf
6. P. Yancey

Citations in the corpus

• Evolution of CAM and C4 Carbon‐Concentrating Mechanisms (2003, background): “Elevational gradients are evident in epiphytic CAM, being most common in lowland tropics where fully expressed CAM is commonplace, but decline in higher montane forests where they are more commonly present as CAM cycling species (Earnshaw et al. 1987).”
• The Ice Plant Cometh: Lessons in Abiotic Stress Tolerance (2000, background): “When grown at elevated atmospheric CO2, some CAM species showed an average increase in biomass of 35% without the downward acclimatization of photosynthesis that is typically observed with many C3 species ( Drennan and Nobel 2000 ).”