Four-Person Envy-Free Chore Division

By Elisha Peterson, Francis Edward Su. 2002

47 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0ffe686d0352b5618b9e8faaf731b8e35de137d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michael A. Jones
2. S. Brams

Citations in the corpus

• Better Ways to Cut a Cake (2006, background): “Brams, Taylor, and Zwicker (1997) previously showed that a maximum of 11 cuts is needed, based on an arguably simpler 4-person, envy-free procedure (for chores, a maximum of 16 cuts may be needed; see Peterson and Su, 2002).”