Species differences in stomatal control of water loss at the canopy scale in a mature bottomland deciduous forest

By D. Pataki, Ram Oren. 2003

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0f10cccd58ba84c49e94999f79a7ddb12e028c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Rebecca A. Montgomery
2. E. Peters
3. Joseph P. McFadden
4. I. Aranda
5. B. Cuesta
6. Suat Irmak
7. Kyoichi Otsuki
8. Denis Mutiibwa

In Global and Planetary Change

1. F. Valladares
2. Rebecca A. Montgomery
3. Joseph P. McFadden
4. E. Peters
5. Christoph Leuschner
6. I. Aranda
7. B. Cuesta
8. Suat Irmak

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Christoph Leuschner
2. F. Valladares
3. Joseph P. McFadden
4. Rebecca A. Montgomery
5. E. Peters
6. Viviana Horna
7. B. Cuesta
8. Suat Irmak

Citations in the corpus

• Transpiration and canopy conductance at two slope positions in a Japanese cedar forest watershed (2008, methodology): “ET for each individual tree was scaled up to the stand level as (Wilson et al., 2001; Wullschleger et al., 2001; Schäfer et al., 2002; Pataki and Oren, 2003; Kumagai et al., 2005a, 2007) EC ¼ JS AS stand AG (1) where EC is the canopy stand E and AG is the ground area.”
• Effects of tree-to-tree and radial variations on sap flow estimates of transpiration in Japanese cedar (2005, methodology): “Transpiration is scaled up to the stand level using the following equation (Granier et al., 1996b; Wilson et al., 2001; Wullschleger et al., 2001; Pataki and Oren, 2003): E ¼ JS AS stand AG (1) where E is the stand transpiration, JS the mean stand sap flux density, AS_stand the stand sapwood area…”
• Leaf water status and stem xylem flux in relation to soil drought in five temperate broad-leaved tree species with contrasting water use strategies (2011, background): “Transpiration of co-existing tree species often varies greatly due to species-specific responses to variation in microclimatic and edaphic parameters (Granier et al., 1996; Oren et al., 2001; Pataki and Oren, 2003; Pataki et al., 2000).”
• On the dynamics of canopy resistance: Generalized linear estimation and relationships with primary micrometeorological variables (2010, methodology): “…response of rc has been shown to match plant hydraulic theory well [Whitehead, 1998; Oren et al., 1999; Ewers et al., 2005; Franks, 2004], which is recently being integrated into models of transpiration and by implication of ETa [Mackay et al., 2003; Pataki and Oren, 2003; Ewers et al., 2008].”
• Biological and environmental controls on tree transpiration in a suburban landscape (2010, background): “Tree species vary in both the magnitude and seasonality of transpiration due to differences in physiology, response to climate, and biophysical characteristics [Bovard et al., 2005; Bowden and Bauerle, 2008; Catovsky et al., 2002; Givnish, 2002; Pataki and Oren, 2003; Tang et al., 2006; Wullschleg”
• Species-specific water use by forest tree species: from the tree to the stand (2012, background): “Along with the species-specific strategy followed in the water use (Pataki and Oren, 2003), other factors are fundamental to understand the water balance of forests.”