Water Use Efficiency and Biomass Partitioning of Three Different Miscanthus Genotypes with Limited and Unlimited Water Supply

By J. Clifton‐Brown, I. Lewandowski. 2000

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0ee06656a21c91df95f87580bc0de888d4020bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. Guy B. Kyser
2. J. Mann
3. J. Di Tomaso
4. M. Brancourt‐Hulmel
5. J. Stewart
6. Astley Hastings
7. J. Barney
8. P. Robson

In Biomedical Engineering

1. M. Brancourt‐Hulmel
2. J. Stewart
3. Astley Hastings
4. P. Robson
5. R. Webster
6. H. Zub
7. Evangelia Stavridou

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Guy B. Kyser
2. J. Mann
3. J. Di Tomaso
4. M. Brancourt‐Hulmel
5. Astley Hastings
6. J. Barney
7. P. Robson
8. R. Webster

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of soil salinity on the yield, composition and physiology of the bioenergy grass Miscanthus × giganteus (2017, methodology): “…by measuring the length and width (at half leaf length) of the youngest fully expanded leaf with a ligule and was calculated as described by Clifton-Brown & Lewandowski (2000) (Eqn 1): Area ðcm2Þ ¼ 0:74 length ðcmÞ width ðcmÞ ð1Þ At the end of the experiment, total above-ground biomass was…”
• Miscanthus × giganteus and Arundo donax shoot and rhizome tolerance of extreme moisture stress (2013, background): “In previous studies, giant miscanthus yield and survival were negatively impacted by drought and prolonged inundation in cultivated settings (Clifton-Brown & Lewandowski, 2000; Lewandowski et al., 2000, 2003; Clifton-Brown et al., 2002; Heaton et al., 2004).”
• Invasiveness potential of Miscanthus sinensis: implications for bioenergy production in the United States (2010, background): “M. sinensis may also be betterCorrespondence: L. D. Quinn, e-mail: ldquinn@illinois.edu 310 r 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd adapted to drought stress than current varieties of M. giganteus (Clifton-Brown & Lewandowski, 2000; Clifton-Brown et al., 2002).”
• Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review (2010, methodology): “During studies to compare M. giganteus, M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus under controlled conditions, a reduction in leaf area was observed in M. giganteus and M. sacchariflorus but not in M. sinensis under water stress (Clifton-Brown and Lewandowski, 2000a; Clifton-Brown et al., 2002).”
• Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop (2010, unknown): “sinensis would be more suitable to drier environments than the other two genotypes since it responded early to drought stress by reducing stomatal conductance and leaf growth (Clifton-Brown and Lewandowski, 2000b).”
• Response of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) to nitrogen fertilization and soil water availability in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. (2014, background): “, 1993; Clifton-Brown and Lewandowski (2000). Out of Miscanthus genotypes, significant reductions in the root biomass were shown by M.”