Eco‐efficiency: Philosophy, Theory, and Tools
By John Ehrenfeld. 2005
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0edb5df43f819f42c157e353f19ce580c7e6f1f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - A systematic literature review (2017, unknown): “…(2006) x x Caetano et al. (2012) x x x x x Charmondusit and Keartpakpraek (2011) x x x Charmondusit et al. (2013) x x Côté et al. (2006) x x x x x Ehrenfeld (2005) x x x x x Erkko et al. (2005) x x x Fortuna et al. (2012) x x x Fujii and Managi (2013) x x x Geng et al. (2012) x x x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7…”
- Progress Toward a Circular Economy in China (2011, background): “The first criterion of eco-efficiency has been intensively discussed in the literature (e.g., Ehrenfeld 2005; Huppes and Ishikawa 2005), and a number of measurements for eco-efficiency have been developed and applied in previous studies, such as a tangible reduction in material throughput; in…”
- A comparison of four sustainable manufacturing strategies (2008, background): “The strategy is concerned with increasing economic development while aiming to lower environmental impact, and is not a new strategy since it has been around since the 1970s (Ehrenfeld 2005 , Cote et al.”
- Eco-efficiency guiding micro-level actions towards sustainability: Ten basic steps for analysis☆ (2009, unknown): “Where there is a substantial influence on specific materials flows, a dynamic materials flow analysis is required; see Elshkaki (2007) for a detailed analysis and survey.”
- Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators (2008, background): “…from a given resource input or that generates a given environmental effect (DeSimone and Popoff 1997; Burritt and Saka 2006).3 In contrast, the inverted ratio, ecointensity (Bartelmus et al. 2004; Ehrenfeld 2005), considers the amount of environmental impact in relation to a business metric.”
- Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis (2018, background): “In the case in which this term is flipped, the ratio is called carbon efficiency (Brattebø 2005), which reveals the economic value a company adds in relation to its environmental impact (Derwall et al. 2005; DeSimone and Popoff 1997; Ehrenfeld 2005; Schaltegger and Sturm 1990; Schmidheiny 1992).”