The issue of competing currencies. Case study – Bitcoin
By Angela Rogojanu, L. Badea. 2014
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0dd63d88d91b0c640e6f87e9cb9388c79e00aa3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Bitcoin as a Complement to Emerging Market Currencies (2016, background): “Rogojanu and Badea (2014) noted that one of the challenges with Bitcoin is that the number of Bitcoins is limited to 21million, but Van Alstyne (2014) pointed out that fractional ownership of a Bitcoin is possible; therefore, the 21 million is not a limiting number.”
- Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets (2016, background): “Neither the events of October 18th 2011 (identified in Garcia et al., 2014) nor of April 13th 2013 (identified in Rogojanu and Badea, 2014) seem to have a lasting impact.”
- Modelling long memory volatility in the Bitcoin market: Evidence of persistence and structural breaks (2018, background): “Some studies refer to Bitcoin as digital gold (Rogojanu and Badea, 2014; Popper, 2015).”
- Spillovers between Bitcoin and other assets during bear and bull markets (2018, background): “…variables have addressed only a few assets at a time, such as U.K. equities, EUR/USD, GBP/USD (Dyhrberg 2016), alternative monetary systems (Rogojanu and Badea 2014), metals and currencies (Baur, Lee, and Hong 2015), global macro-financial development (Ciaian, CONTACT Elie Bouri…”
- On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? (2017, unknown): “Rogojanu and Badea (2014) compare Bitcoin to alternative monetary systems.”
- Bitcoin for energy commodities before and after the December 2013 crash: diversifier, hedge or safe haven? (2017, unknown): “Rogojanu and Badea (2014) explore the advantages and disadvantages of Bitcoin and compare it with other alternative monetary systems.”