Two- or three-dimensional simulations of turbulent gas–solid flows applied to fluidization

By E. Peirano, V. Delloume, B. Leckner. 2001

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0cc39c555ca298cd95c8bce5078165697849e96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. A. Acosta-Iborra
2. F. Hernández-Jiménez
3. M. Vega
4. Francine Battaglia
5. Sreekanth Pannala
6. C. Sobrino
7. N. Xie

In Ocean Engineering

1. Francine Battaglia
2. Sreekanth Pannala
3. N. Xie

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of using two- versus three-dimensional computational modeling of fluidized beds: Part I, hydrodynamics (2008, methodology): “[29] performed numerical simulations of a rectangular bubbling fluidized bed using the code ESTET/ ASTRID.”
• Experimental and computational study on the bubble behavior in a 3-D fluidized bed (2011, background): “Peirano et al. (2001) studied, in a statistically stationary bubbling flui dized bed of rectangular section (one lateral length much shorter than the other), the differences between 2 D and 3 D simulations by comparing their numerical simulations to experimental data concerning the power spectra of…”