Paraphrase-Driven Learning for Open Question Answering
By Anthony Fader, Luke S. Zettlemoyer, Oren Etzioni. 2013
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Question Answering & Reading Comprehension
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Percy Liang
- Jianfeng Gao
- Graham Neubig
- Jonathan Berant
- Richard Socher
- Yejin Choi
In Question Answering & Reading Comprehension
- Peter Clark
- Wen-tau Yih
- Jonathan Berant
- Ashish Sabharwal
- Tushar Khot
- Percy Liang
- Xiaodong He
- Siva Reddy
Citations in the corpus
- A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inference (2016, methodology): “Our method is motivated by the central role played by alignment in machine translation (Koehn, 2009) and previous approaches to sentence similarity modeling (Haghighi et al., 2005; Das and Smith, 2009; Chang et al., 2010; Fader et al., 2013), natural language inference (Marsi and Krahmer, 2005; MacC”
- Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks (2015, methodology): “It can be considered the simplest case of some real world QA datasets such as in (Fader et al., 2013).”
- VQA: Visual Question Answering (2015, background): “Text-based Q&A is a well studied problem in the NLP and text processing communities (recent examples being [12, 11, 46, 38]).”
- Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks (2015, methodology): “The Reverb test set, based on the KB of the same name and introduced in (Fader et al., 2013) is used for evaluation only.”
- Yin and Yang: Balancing and Answering Binary Visual Questions (2015, background): “Text-based QA is a well studied problem in the natural language processing (NLP) community, recent examples being [14, 15, 33, 40].”
- Modeling Biological Processes for Reading Comprehension (2014, methodology): “Such methods rely on redundancy, and are thus suitable for answering common factoid questions which have ample evidence in text (Fader et al., 2013).”
- Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings (2014, methodology): “To overcome this issue, we follow (Fader et al., 2013) and supplement our training data with an indirect supervision signal made of pairs of question paraphrases collected from the WIKIANSWERS website.”
- Semantic Parsing via Paraphrasing (2014, methodology): “Fader et al. (2013) presented a QA system that maps questions onto simple queries against Open IE extractions, by learning paraphrases from a large mono-lingual parallel corpus, and performing a single paraphrasing step.”
- Scaling Semantic Parsers with On-the-Fly Ontology Matching (2013, methodology): “Fader et al. (2013) recently presented a scalable approach to learning an open domain QA system, where ontological mismatches are resolved with learned paraphrases.”
- Building a Semantic Parser Overnight (2015, methodology): “Paraphrasing has been applied to singleproperty question answering (Fader et al., 2013) and semantic parsing (Berant and Liang, 2014).”
- Open Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models (2014, methodology): “Following [10], we hence decided to create such question-triple pairs automatically.”
- Semantic Parsing for Single-Relation Question Answering (2014, methodology): “Following (Huang et al., 2013), for every pattern, the corresponding relation is treated as a positive example and 100 randomly selected other relations are used as negative examples.”
- Ask the Right Questions: Active Question Reformulation with Reinforcement Learning (2017, methodology): “The monolingual data is extracted from the Paralex database of question paraphrases [Fader et al., 2013].”
- Information Extraction over Structured Data: Question Answering with Freebase (2014, background): “Fader et al. (2013) learned question paraphrases from aligning multiple questions with the same answers generated by WikiAnswers.”
- Answering Complex Questions Using Open Information Extraction (2017, methodology): “QA systems using semi-structured Open IE tuples (Fader et al., 2013, 2014; Yin et al., 2015) or automatically extracted web tables (Sun et al., 2016; Pasupat and Liang, 2015) have broader coverage but are limited to simple questions with a single query.”