Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: The need to harmonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures

By D. Briese. 2005

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Classical biological control: exploiting enemy escape to manage plant invasions (2008, background): “The measurement of risk to nontarget species may be further refined by limiting host-specificity tests to those closely related nontarget species that show bio-geographical overlap or ecological similarity (e.g., similar life-history, Briese 2003; Briese 2005).”
Biological control of invasive species: solution or pollution? (2006, unknown): “Briese DT. 2005.”
Risk and ethics in biological control (2005, background): “…control researchers must continue to develop and improve host-speciWcity testing protocols to improve the prediction of the ecological host range by physiological host-speciWcity testing (e.g., Briese, 2005; Delfosse, 2000; Sheppard et al., 2005), including using f1 sterility and expert systems.”
Applying molecular-based approaches to classical biological control of weeds (2011, background): “be refined by biogeographical overlap and ecological similarity (Briese, 2005), or secondary criteria (rarity, economic importance,”