The philosophical significance of image schemas

By Mark E. Johnson. 2005

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0a7e67b1b2945f5d896b2ef3ebd83e4d74d12ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Daniel Casasanto
2. Diane Pecher
3. Inge Boot
4. Saskia van Dantzig

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Daniel Casasanto
2. Diane Pecher
3. Inge Boot
4. Saskia van Dantzig

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

1. Daniel Casasanto

Citations in the corpus

• Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond (2011, background): “Image schemas thus may be skeletal, providing a basic structure, to which the flesh (specific perceptual detail, valence, and so on) is added by particular meaning and context (e.g., Gibbs, 2006; Johnson, 2005).”
• Space for thinking (2009, background): “Johnson (2005) defines an image schema as “a dynamic recurring pattern of organism-environment interactions” (pg. 19).”