Inferring brain-computational mechanisms with models of activity measurements
By Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Jörn Diedrichsen. 2016
53 citations recorded by the source corpus.
High-resolution functional imaging is providing increasingly rich measurements of brain activity in animals and humans. A major challenge is to leverage such data to gain insight into the brain's computational mechanisms. The first step is to define candidate brain-computational models (BCMs) that can perform the behavioural task in question. We would then like to infer which of the candidate BCMs best accounts for measured brain-activity data. Here we describe a method that complements each BCM by a measurement model (MM), which simulates the way the brain-activity measurements reflect neuronal activity (e.g. local averaging in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) voxels or sparse sampling in array recordings). The resulting generative model (BCM-MM) produces simulated measurements. To avoid having to fit the MM to predict each individual measurement channel of the brain-activity data, we compare the measured and predicted data at the level of summary statistics. We describe a novel particular implementation of this approach, called probabilistic representational similarity analysis (pRSA) with MMs, which uses representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) as the summary statistics. We validate this method by simulations of fMRI measurements (locally averaging voxels) based on a deep convolutional neural network for visual object recognition. Results indicate that the way the measurements sample the activity patterns strongly affects the apparent representational dissimilarities. However, modelling of the measurement process can account for these effects, and different BCMs remain distinguishable even under substantial noise. The pRSA method enables us to perform Bayesian inference on the set of BCMs and to recognize the data-generating model in each case. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interpreting BOLD: a dialogue between cognitive and cellular neuroscience’.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Tal Golan
- Martin N. Hebart
- Chris L. Baker
- Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
- Josh Tenenbaum
- John-Dylan Haynes
- Jörn Diedrichsen
- Grace W. Lindsay
Citations in the corpus
- Deconstructing multivariate decoding for the study of brain function (2017, background): “, 2016), or distributional assumptions (Kriegeskorte, 2011; Kriegeskorte and Diedrichsen, 2016).”
- Neural network models and deep learning - a primer for biologists (2019, methodology): “In another approach, called representational similarity analysis (Kriegeskorte et al., 2008; Nili et al., 2014; Kriegeskorte and Diedrichsen, 2016), each representation in brain and model is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix.”