Sorting out Relative Clauses

By S. Hulsey, Uli Sauerland. 2006

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c09c5231390555d23515c489f63d1ec584ea579f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. I. Sichel
2. Shoichi Takahashi
3. Martin Hackl
4. J. Nissenbaum
5. S. Hulsey

In Language and Linguistics

1. I. Sichel
2. Shoichi Takahashi
3. Martin Hackl
4. J. Nissenbaum
5. S. Hulsey

Citations in the corpus

• Wholesale Late Merger: Beyond the A/ Distinction (2009, background): “…necessary to postulate an ambiguity between two different structures for restrictive relative clauses in English: namely, English has both a matching structure and a raising structure (see also Bhatt 2002, Carlson 1977, and Hulsey and Sauerland 2006 for relevant discussion and related proposals).”
• A modal ambiguity in for-infinitival relative clauses (2012, background): “C. Extraposition Effects with FIRs: Extraposition of a relative clause is possible only if the relative clause has a matching structure (Hulsey & Sauerland 2006; among others).”
• Resumptive Pronouns and Competition (2014, background): “The idea that RC-internal quantifiers that take scope outside of the RC must involve Quantifier Raising (QR) of the binder was first expressed by Doron (1982) and more recently by Hulsey and Sauerland (2006) and Heim (2012).”