Demographic Covariates of Residential Recycling Efficiency

By J. Owens, S. Dickerson, D. Macintosh. 2000

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0981566802dbd325a42fb7dc44415f05e4c668d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. L. O'Shea
2. Andrew James Abbott
3. Shasikanta Nandeibam

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. L. O'Shea
2. Andrew James Abbott
3. Shasikanta Nandeibam

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. O'Shea
2. Andrew James Abbott
3. Shasikanta Nandeibam

Citations in the corpus

• Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK (2011, background): “Furthermore, higher incomes may lead to higher rates of recycling because high earning households can afford to pay for a better environment (Berglund and Söderholm, 2003; Owens et al., 2000; Terry, 2002).”
• Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited (2013, background): “…income may have a higher opportunity cost of time, so 408 the volume of recyclable material will fall (Sidique et al., 2010), whilst the literature 409 has also suggested higher earners can afford to pay for a better environment (Berglund 410 and Söderholm, 2003; Owens et al., 2000; Terry, 2002).”
• Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries. (2009, background): “, 2000; Domina and Koch, 2002), education (Hornik et al., 1995; Hanyu et al., 2000; Owens et al., 2000), gender (Johnson et al.”