Chemical and biochemical properties of humic substances isolated from forest soils and plant growth

By S. Nardi, D. Pizzeghello, F. Reniero, N. Rascio. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

To investigate the relationships among litter composition and 13 C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectra ( 13 C-NMR), we studied δ 13 C values and biochemical activities of the humic constituents extracted from the Ah horizons of two undisturbed forest soils, located in a unique climatic area under different vegetative covers, Pinus mugo T. and Pinus sylvestris L. The two litters differed greatly in composition, while the 13 C-NMR spectra of the humic substances extracted from the two Ah horizons were similar. The 13 C-NMR spectra of the low molecular humic size (LMS) 1-2 revealed high aromatic and carboxylic contents and low aliphatic and carbohydratic ones. The total humic extracts (TQ) 1-2 and the high molecular humic size (HMS) 1-2 exhibited an opposite trend. The δ 13 C values of the humic fractions ranged from -24.96 to -25.84‰, indicating an advanced stage of humification. The biochemical activities of the humic fractions were studied by evaluating the invertase, peroxidase, and esterase activities in Pinus mugo and Pinus sylvestris seedling roots grown in the presence of their humic matter, These forest species were differently affected by their humic substances. In particular, the Pinus sylvestris humic matter, endowed with a higher indoleacetic acid (IAA) content, positively influenced all the enzymes tested in Pinus sylvestris seedlings, while the Pinus mugo humic matter only increased the peroxidase activity in its seedlings. The plant species differ in their capacity to respond to biological humus activity, which is reflected in their natural distribution.

Subfields: Plant Science, Pollution, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c088820e86ec90deafcca631f6c7ca48ad5b3b04

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

  1. L. Nelson
  2. A. Ertani
  3. D. Pizzeghello
  4. S. Nardi
  5. Pamela Calvo
  6. J. Kloepper
  7. M. Schiavon
  8. C. Ryu

In Pollution

  1. J. Kloepper

In Soil Science

  1. A. Ertani
  2. J. Kloepper

Citations in the corpus