Prey size selection in piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) includes active prey choice

By H. Turesson, A. Persson, C. Brönmark. 2002

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0823ca15ac2cda09393bfab66714e7265586d8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. O. Rauhut

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Roger B. J. Benson
2. M. Langer
3. Jorge Ferigolo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. O. Rauhut
2. D. Hone
3. Roger B. J. Benson
4. M. Langer
5. Jorge Ferigolo

Citations in the corpus

• The Spines of the Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, as an Anti-Predator Adaptation: an Experimental Study (2006, background): “Optimal foraging theory considers that the energetic benefits of a prey item are weighed against the costs of capturing, ingesting, and digesting the prey (Pyke 1979; Townsend & Winfield 1985; Turesson et al. 2002).”
• Feeding behaviour and bone utilization by theropod dinosaurs (2009, background): “…larger individuals by such diverse predators as leopards (Hayward et al. 2006), hunting dogs (Fuller & Kat 1993), bluefish (Scharf et al. 1998) and several invertebrates (Barbeau & Scheibling 1994) or simply small prey in general (e.g. Webb et al. 1991; Gotmark & Post 1996; Turesson et al. 2002).”