The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis

By M. Trigg, C. Birch, Jeffrey C. Neal, Paul D. Bates, Andrew Smith, Chris Sampson, Dai Yamazaki, Y. Hirabayashi, Florian Pappenberger, E. Dutra and 9 more. Environmental Research Letters, 2016

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Quantifying flood hazard is an essential component of resilience planning, emergency response, and mitigation, including insurance. Traditionally undertaken at catchment and national scales, recently, efforts have intensified to estimate flood risk globally to better allow consistent and equitable decision making. Global flood hazard models are now a practical reality, thanks to improvements in numerical algorithms, global datasets, computing power, and coupled modelling frameworks. Outputs of these models are vital for consistent quantification of global flood risk and in projecting the impacts of climate change. However, the urgency of these tasks means that outputs are being used as soon as they are made available and before such methods have been adequately tested. To address this, we compare multi-probability flood hazard maps for Africa from six global models and show wide variation in their flood hazard, economic loss and exposed population estimates, which has serious implications for model credibility. While there is around 30%–40% agreement in flood extent, our results show that even at continental scales, there are significant differences in hazard magnitude and spatial pattern between models, notably in deltas, arid/semi-arid zones and wetlands. This study is an important step towards a better understanding of modelling global flood hazard, which is urgently required for both current risk and climate change projections.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c07defc9fbcf453552728b09b2991903c1aba68f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
  2. W. Botzen
  3. Stéphane Hallegatte
  4. Brenden Jongman
  5. Paul D. Bates
  6. Philip J. Ward
  7. Daniel Osberghaus
  8. Rafael Reuveny

In Water Science and Technology

  1. Stéphane Hallegatte
  2. Brenden Jongman
  3. Paul D. Bates
  4. Philip J. Ward
  5. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts

Citations in the corpus