Reactions of harbor porpoises Phocoena phocoena and herring Clupea harengus to acoustic alarms

By B. Culik, S. Koschinski, N. Tregenza, G. Ellis. 2001

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c077245178cdb9f7bf38271ddb1a82e2e7853b95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. P. Tyack
2. Douglas Nowacek
3. L. Thorne
4. Andrew J. Read
5. A. Englund
6. R. Reeves
7. G. Ellis
8. E. Rogan

In Ecology

1. R. Reeves
2. P. Tyack
3. Douglas Nowacek
4. Andrew J. Read
5. L. Thorne
6. G. Bearzi
7. D. Waples
8. David W. Johnston

In Oceanography

1. Douglas Nowacek
2. P. Tyack
3. L. Thorne
4. Andrew J. Read
5. David W. Johnston
6. R. Reeves
7. D. Waples
8. A. Englund

Citations in the corpus

• Reducing the risk of lethal encounters: vessels and right whales in the Bay of Fundy and on the Scotian Shelf (2008, result): “Such devices have been successful in reducing incidental entanglements of harbour porpoises (e.g. Kraus et al. 1997, Trippel et al. 1999, Culik et al. 2001) but we know of no similar results for large baleen whales.”
• Behavioural reactions of free-ranging porpoises and seals to the noise of a simulated 2 MW windpower generator (2003, background): “However, from experiments with different pingers operating at similar source levels but different frequencies, it is known that free-ranging harbour porpoises leave the area around such artificial sound sources (Koschinski & Culik 1997, Culik et al. 2001).”
• A review of the effects of seismic surveys on marine mammals (2003, unknown): “Acoustic monitoring can be carried out using remote hydrophones or receivers (Clark & Fristrup, 1997; Clark & Charif, 1998; Culik et al., 2001) or from relatively inexpensive small vessels that are quiet and are unlikely to affect the behavior of the study animals.”
• Ecology and conservation of common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the Mediterranean Sea (2009, background): “Indeed, some evidence suggests that pingers (low power ADDs, as opposed to AHDs) have exclusion effects on harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena (Culik et al., 2001).”
• Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise (2007, background): “For example, Culik et al. (2001) assessed the behaviour of porpoises in relation to one type of ADD as well as the catches of fish in relation to three different ADD designs in an active fishery.”
• Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada (2002, background): “…of acoustic deterrent devices in preventing porpoise by-catch in gillnets (Koschinski and Culik, 1997; Kraus et al., 1997; Kastelein et al., 2000b; Culik et al., 2001) and the shortterm impact of acoustic harassment on harbour porpoise was tested for m underwater and was estimated to reach…”
• Using T-PODs to investigate the echolocation of coastal bottlenose dolphins (2007, background): “Little work has been carried out on species other than the harbour porpoise (Cox et al., 2001; Culik et al., 2001; Teilmann et al., 2002; Koschinski et al., 2003; Carlström, 2005; Carstensen et al., 2006; Koschinski et al., 2006) and the finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocoaenoides Cuvier)…”
• To ping or not to ping: the use of active acoustic devices in mitigating interactions between small cetaceans and gillnet fisheries (2013, background): “…3 different pinger types (Lien, Dukane and PICE) in a commercial herring fishery showed that the Lien pinger (2.9 kHz) was associated with a significantly higher catch rate of herring, but that nets with the other 2 pingers had very similar catch rates to nets without pingers (Culik et al. 2001).”
• Behavioral responses of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, to gillnets and acoustic alarms (2004, background): “Culik et al. (2001) displayed a similar exclusion of 130 m (see Fig.”