A perspective on match/mismatch of phenology in community contexts

By Takefumi Nakazawa, Hideyuki Doi. 2012

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c06b3916057d73c66a517f071c13ba41bf7c2b1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. H. Van Dyck
2. Dirk Maes
3. Silke Bauer
4. J. Pöyry
5. K. Saarinen

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Van Dyck
2. Dirk Maes
3. Silke Bauer
4. D. Bonte
5. K. Gotthard

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. H. Van Dyck
2. Dirk Maes
3. D. Bonte
4. S. Hahn
5. Silke Bauer
6. S. Lisovski
7. M. Baguette
8. J. Pöyry

Citations in the corpus

• The lost generation hypothesis: could climate change drive ectotherms into a developmental trap ? (2015, background): “Accepted 21 November 2014 Oikos 124: 54–61, 2015 doi: 10.1111/oik.02066 mismatches between resources and consumer (Saino et al. 2011, Nakazawa and Doi 2012).”
• Timing is crucial for consequences of migratory connectivity (2016, background): “The timing of migration relative to resident phenology is fundamental to the strength and direction of migrantresident interactions (Yang and Rudolf 2010) and can influence key-features of communities (Nakazawa and Doi 2012).”