Generating Diverse Code Explanations using the GPT-3 Large Language Model

By Stephen MacNeil, Andrew Tran, Dan Mogil, Seth Bernstein, Erin Ross, Ziheng Huang. 2022

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Good explanations are essential to efficiently learning introductory programming concepts [10]. To provide high-quality explanations at scale, numerous systems automate the process by tracing the execution of code [8, 12], defining terms [9], giving hints [16], and providing error-specific feedback [10, 16]. However, these approaches often require manual effort to configure and only explain a single aspect of a given code segment. Large language models (LLMs) are also changing how students interact with code [7]. For example, Github's Copilot can generate code for programmers [4], leading researchers to raise concerns about cheating [7]. Instead, our work focuses on LLMs' potential to support learning by explaining numerous aspects of a given code snippet. This poster features a systematic analysis of the diverse natural language explanations that GPT-3 can generate automatically for a given code snippet. We present a subset of three use cases from our evolving design space of AI Explanations of Code.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Hardware and Architecture, Software, Large Language Models, Code Generation & Program Synthesis

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

  1. Paul Denny
  2. Juho Leinonen
  3. Sami Sarsa
  4. Arto Hellas
  5. Stephen MacNeil
  6. Seth Bernstein
  7. Andrew Tran
  8. Joanne Kim

In Software

  1. Paul Denny
  2. Juho Leinonen
  3. Arto Hellas
  4. Sami Sarsa
  5. Stephen MacNeil
  6. Seth Bernstein
  7. Andrew Tran
  8. Joanne Kim

In Large Language Models

  1. Paul Denny
  2. Juho Leinonen
  3. Sami Sarsa
  4. Arto Hellas
  5. James Prather
  6. Brett A. Becker
  7. Brent N. Reeves
  8. Nasser Giacaman

In Code Generation & Program Synthesis

  1. Paul Denny
  2. Juho Leinonen
  3. Sami Sarsa
  4. Arto Hellas
  5. Stephen MacNeil
  6. Seth Bernstein
  7. Andrew Tran
  8. Joanne Kim

Citations in the corpus