Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model
By Charlotte K. Hemelrijk, H. Kunz. 2005
176 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c065c1f492426f86d14c78b1bdbb80a053416488
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- H. Hildenbrandt
- Claudio Carere
- Charlotte K. Hemelrijk
- A. G. Wood
- Nikolai Bode
- Daniel W. Franks
- Lesley J. Morrell
- Damien Farine
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Organized Shape and Frontal Density of Fish Schools (2008, methodology): “In an earlier model the origin of an oblong group shape arose similarly (Kunz & Hemelrijk 2003; Hemelrijk & Kunz 2005), even though individuals can not catch up with others because they move at constant speed with random error.”
- Self-organised complex aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model (2009, background): “Individuals in our models of fish schools may try to avoid collisions by slowing down (Hemelrijk and Hildenbrandt, 2008) and thus increasing the length of the school or by turning away (Hemelrijk and Kunz, 2005; Kunz and Hemelrijk, 2003).”
- Optimal individual positions within animal groups (2008, background): “…models which relate proximate factors such as attraction–repulsion rules, speed, and trajectory to group position (Romey 1996; Krause et al. 2000; Hemelrijk and Kunz 2005) but few that directly tie evolutionary fitness to position (but for a theoretical study of the effect of spatial position…”
- The impact of social networks on animal collective motion (2011, background): “Previous models that have considered social networks underlying collective motion have translated social preferences into attractive or aligning forces between individuals (e.g. Braun et al. 2003; Hemelrijk & Kunz 2005; Moussaïd et al. 2010).”
- Inferring individual rules from collective behavior (2010, background): “Zonal models have revealed much about collective motion: dynamic switching between collective patterns (8), effects of leadership on uninformed members (9), and how group size (21, 22), number of neighbors (6, 21), and heterogeneity in members (23) influence emergent group properties such as shape, ”