Effects of economic disincentives on private car use

By Cecilia Jakobsson, Satoshi Fujii, Tommy Gärling. 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c06126149b55d8fb02d6be38ee5ab8743c8cf2e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Jana Sochor
2. L. Steg
3. M. Friman
4. Jochen Richter
5. David Lois
6. Mercedes López-Sáez
7. Tommy Gärling

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Steg
2. David Lois
3. Mercedes López-Sáez
4. Tommy Gärling
5. M. Friman
6. Steffen Kallbekken

In Transportation

1. M. Friman
2. L. Steg
3. Tommy Gärling
4. Jochen Richter
5. Jana Sochor
6. David Lois
7. Mercedes López-Sáez
8. Helena Strömberg

Citations in the corpus

• Soft Transport Policy Measures: Gaps in Knowledge (2011, background): “Some research has failed to show lasting effects of a free monthly public transport ticket offered to frequent car users (Fujii and Kitamura 2003; Thøgersen 2009; Thøgersen and Møller 2008) or increased car use costs (Jakobsson, Fujii, and Gärling 2002).”
• Developing the ‘Service’ in Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a Field Trial of an Innovative Travel Brokerage (2016, background): “Examples include (i) economic disincentives for car use, including congestion charges, taxes and parking fees (e.g., Jakobsson et al., 2002; Washbrook et al., 2006; Börjesson et al., 2012), (ii) information campaigns and advertising to increase awareness of the effects of, and alternatives to car…”
• Promoting household energy conservation (2008, background): “…and Johnson, 1983, 1984), eliciting implementation intentions in which people indicate how they plan to reduce their energy use (e.g. Bamberg, 2002; Jakobsson et al., 2002), and modelling and providing information about the behaviour of others (Schultz et al., 2007; see also Abrahamse et al.,…”
• The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach (2009, background): “Some of the arguments that explain this preference are based on the fact that adequate public transportation is not always available, and the car allows one to move faster and also to load one’s purchases (Jakobsson, 2007; Jakobsson et al., 2002).”